Constraints
Equality constraints between polynomials
Equality between polynomials in PolyJuMP uses the same syntax as equality between affine or quadratic expression in JuMP. For instance, creating two quadratic n-variate polynomials p and q that must sum up to one can be done as follows:
julia> n = 3
3
julia> using DynamicPolynomials
julia> @polyvar x[1:n]
(Variable{DynamicPolynomials.Commutative{DynamicPolynomials.CreationOrder}, Graded{LexOrder}}[x₁, x₂, x₃],)
julia> X = monomials(x, 0:2)
10-element MonomialVector{DynamicPolynomials.Commutative{DynamicPolynomials.CreationOrder}, Graded{LexOrder}}:
1
x₃
x₂
x₁
x₃²
x₂x₃
x₂²
x₁x₃
x₁x₂
x₁²
julia> using SumOfSquares
julia> model = Model()
A JuMP Model
Feasibility problem with:
Variables: 0
Model mode: AUTOMATIC
CachingOptimizer state: NO_OPTIMIZER
Solver name: No optimizer attached.
julia> @variable(model, p, Poly(X))
(_[1]) + (_[2])x₃ + (_[3])x₂ + (_[4])x₁ + (_[5])x₃² + (_[6])x₂x₃ + (_[7])x₂² + (_[8])x₁x₃ + (_[9])x₁x₂ + (_[10])x₁²
julia> @variable(model, q, Poly(X))
(_[11]) + (_[12])x₃ + (_[13])x₂ + (_[14])x₁ + (_[15])x₃² + (_[16])x₂x₃ + (_[17])x₂² + (_[18])x₁x₃ + (_[19])x₁x₂ + (_[20])x₁²
julia> @constraint(model, p + q == 1)
(_[1] + _[11] - 1) + (_[2] + _[12])x₃ + (_[3] + _[13])x₂ + (_[4] + _[14])x₁ + (_[5] + _[15])x₃² + (_[6] + _[16])x₂x₃ + (_[7] + _[17])x₂² + (_[8] + _[18])x₁x₃ + (_[9] + _[19])x₁x₂ + (_[10] + _[20])x₁² ∈ PolyJuMP.ZeroPoly()Vectorized constraints can also be used as well as vector of constraints, named constraints, ... For instance, if P and Q are two $n \times n$ matrices of polynomials, the following constraints the sum of rows and columns to match:
@constraint(model, con[i=1:n], sum(P[i, :]) == sum(Q[:, i]))and con[i] contains the reference to the constraint between the ith row of P and the ith column of Q.
Inequality constraints between polynomials
Polynomials can be constrained to be sum-of-squares with the in syntax. For instance, to constrain a polynomial p to be sum-of-squares, do
julia> @constraint(model, p in SOSCone())
(_[1]) + (_[2])x₃ + (_[3])x₂ + (_[4])x₁ + (_[5])x₃² + (_[6])x₂x₃ + (_[7])x₂² + (_[8])x₁x₃ + (_[9])x₁x₂ + (_[10])x₁² is SOSAutomatically interpreting polynomial nonnegativity as a sum-of-squares constraint
As detailed in When is nonnegativity equivalent to sum of squares ?, the nonnegativity of a polynomial is not equivalent to the existence of a sum-of-squares decomposition. However, if explicitely specified, nonnegativity constraints can be automatically interpreted as sum-of-squares constraints. The simplest way to do that is to create the model with
model = SOSModel(...)instead of
model = Model(...)An alternative equivalent way is to call setpolymodule! after creating the model:
julia> setpolymodule!(model, SumOfSquares)This second approach may be useful if the SumOfSquares JuMP extension need to be used with another JuMP extension that also has a special model constructor. A third alternative is the following:
julia> PolyJuMP.setdefault!(model, PolyJuMP.NonNegPoly, SOSCone)
SOSCone (alias for NonnegPolyInnerCone{MathOptInterface.PositiveSemidefiniteConeTriangle})
julia> PolyJuMP.setdefault!(model, PolyJuMP.PosDefPolyMatrix, SOSMatrixCone)
SOSMatrixCone (alias for PSDMatrixInnerCone{MathOptInterface.PositiveSemidefiniteConeTriangle})This approach adds the flexibility to choose the default cone for
- constraints of the form
@constraint(mode, ..., some_polynomial ≥ other_polynomial, ...)which is the cone given as default toPolyJuMP.NonNegPoly; and - constraints of the form
@constraint(mode, ..., some_matrix_of_polynomial in PSDCone(), ...)or@constraint(mode, ..., some_matrix_of_polynomial >= other_matrix_of_polynomial, PSDCone(), ...)which is the cone given as default toPolyJuMP.NonNegPolyMatrix.
For instance, to use the diagonally-dominant-sum-of-squares cone (see [Definition 2, AM17]) for the first type of contraints, do
julia> PolyJuMP.setdefault!(model, PolyJuMP.NonNegPoly, DSOSCone)
DSOSCone (alias for NonnegPolyInnerCone{SumOfSquares.DiagonallyDominantConeTriangle})Changing the polynomial basis
As introduced in Choosing a polynomial basis, there may be numerical advantages to use another basis than the standard monomial basis when creating polynomial variables. Similarly, other polynomial bases can be used for polynomial constraints. However, for constraints, the polynomial space is determined by the polynomial constrained to be nonnegative. For instance, consider the constraint:
julia> using DynamicPolynomials
julia> @polyvar x y
(x, y)
julia> using SumOfSquares
julia> model = SOSModel()
A JuMP Model
Feasibility problem with:
Variables: 0
Model mode: AUTOMATIC
CachingOptimizer state: NO_OPTIMIZER
Solver name: No optimizer attached.
julia> @variable(model, α)
α
julia> @variable(model, β)
β
julia> @constraint(model, α * x^2 + β * y^2 ≥ (α - β) * x * y)
(β)y² + (-α + β)xy + (α)x² is SOSwhere α and β are JuMP decision variables and x and y are polynomial variables. Since the polynomial is a quadratic form, the sum-of-squares certificate is also a quadratic form (see [Section~3.3.4, BPT12]). Hence the default polynomial basis used for the [Nonnegative polynomial variables] certificate is MonomialBasis([x, y]), that is, we search for a positive semidefinite matrix Q such that
\[\alpha x^2 + \beta y^2 - (\alpha - \beta) x y = X^\top Q X\]
where $X = (x, y)$.
As the polynomial space is determined by the polynomial being constrained, only the basis type needs to be given. For instance, to use the scaled monomial basis in the example above, use
julia> @constraint(model, α * x^2 + β * y^2 ≥ (α - β) * x * y, basis = ScaledMonomialBasis)
(β)y² + (-α + β)xy + (α)x² is SOSPolynomial nonnegativity on a subset of the space
By default, the constraint
julia> @constraint(model, x^3 - x^2 + 2x*y -y^2 + y^3 >= α)
(-α) + (-1)y² + (2)xy + (-1)x² + (1)y³ + (1)x³ is SOSconstrains the polynomial to be nonnegative for every real numbers x and y. However, the set of points (x, y) for which the polynomial is constrained to be nonnegative can be specified by the domain keyword:
julia> S = @set x >= 0 && y >= 0 && x + y >= 1;
julia> @constraint(model, x^3 - x^2 + 2x*y -y^2 + y^3 >= α, domain = S)
(-α) + (-1)y² + (2)xy + (-1)x² + (1)y³ + (1)x³ is SOSSee this notebook for a detailed example.
Dual of polynomial constraints
The dual of a polynomial constraint cref is a moment serie μ as defined in MultivariateMoments. The dual can be obtained with the dual function as with classical dual values in JuMP.
μ = dual(cref)By dual of a Sum-of-Squares constraint, we may mean different things and the meaning chosen for dual function was chosen for consistency with the definition of the JuMP dual function to ensure that generic code will work as expected with Sum-of-Squares constraints. In a Sum-of-Squares constraint, a polynomial $p$ is constraint to be SOS in some domain defined by polynomial q_i. So p(x) is constrained to be equal to s(x) = s_0(x) + s_1(x) * q_1(x) + s_2(x) * q_2(x) + ... where the s_i(x) polynomials are Sum-of-Squares. The dual of the equality constraint between p(x) and s(x) is given by SumOfSquares.MultivariateMoments.moments.
μ = moments(cref)Note that the dual and moments may give different results. For instance, the output of dual only contains the moments corresponding to monomials of p while the output of moments may give the moments of other monomials if s(x) has more monomials than p(x). Besides, if the domain contains polynomial, equalities, only the remainder of p(x) - s(x) modulo the ideal is constrained to be zero, see Corollary 2 of [CLO13]. In that case, the output moments is the dual of the constraint on the remainder so some monomials may have different moments with dual or moments.
The dual of the Sum-of-Squares constraint on s_0(x), commonly referred to as the the matrix of moments can be obtained using moment_matrix:
ν = moment_matrix(cref)The atomic_measure function of MultivariateMoments can be used to check if there exists an atomic measure (i.e. a measure that is a sum of Dirac measures) that has the moments given in the the moment matrix ν. This can be used for instance in polynomial optimization (see this notebook) or stability analysis (see this notebook).
References
[BPT12] Blekherman, G.; Parrilo, P. A. & Thomas, R. R. Semidefinite Optimization and Convex Algebraic Geometry. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2012.
[CLO13] Cox, D., Little, J., & OShea, D. Ideals, varieties, and algorithms: an introduction to computational algebraic geometry and commutative algebra. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
[AM17] Ahmadi, A. A. & Majumdar, A. DSOS and SDSOS Optimization: More Tractable Alternatives to Sum of Squares and Semidefinite Optimization. ArXiv e-prints, 2017.
API Reference
Default choice for the maxdegree keyword:
SumOfSquares.default_maxdegree — Functiondefault_maxdegree(monos, domain)Return the default maxdegree to use for certifying a polynomial with monomials monos to be Sum-of-Squares over the domain domain. By default, the maximum of the maxdegree of monos and of all multipliers of the domain are used so that at least constant multipliers can be used with a Putinar certificate.
Special case that is second-order cone representable:
SumOfSquares.PositiveSemidefinite2x2ConeTriangle — Typestruct PositiveSemidefinite2x2ConeTriangle <: MOI.AbstractSymmetricMatrixSetTriangle endCone of positive semidefinite matrices of 2 rows and 2 columns.
Inner approximations of the PSD cone that do not require semidefinite programming:
SumOfSquares.DiagonallyDominantConeTriangle — Typestruct DiagonallyDominantConeTriangle <: MOI.AbstractSymmetricMatrixSetTriangle
side_dimension::Int
endSee Definition 4 of [AM17] for a precise definition of the last two items.
[AM17] Ahmadi, A. A. & Majumdar, A. DSOS and SDSOS Optimization: More Tractable Alternatives to Sum of Squares and Semidefinite Optimization ArXiv e-prints, 2017.
SumOfSquares.ScaledDiagonallyDominantConeTriangle — Typestruct ScaledDiagonallyDominantConeTriangle <: MOI.AbstractSymmetricMatrixSetTriangle
side_dimension::Int
endSee Definition 4 of [AM17] for a precise definition of the last two items.
[AM17] Ahmadi, A. A. & Majumdar, A. DSOS and SDSOS Optimization: More Tractable Alternatives to Sum of Squares and Semidefinite Optimization ArXiv e-prints, 2017.
Approximations of the cone of nonnegative polynomials:
SumOfSquares.NonnegPolyInnerCone — Typestruct NonnegPolyInnerCone{MCT <: MOI.AbstractVectorSet}
endInner approximation of the cone of nonnegative polynomials defined by the set of polynomials of the form
X^\top Q Xwhere X is a vector of monomials and Q is a symmetric matrix that belongs to the cone psd_inner.
SumOfSquares.SOSCone — Typeconst SOSCone = NonnegPolyInnerCone{MOI.PositiveSemidefiniteConeTriangle}Sum-of-squares cone; see NonnegPolyInnerCone.
SumOfSquares.SDSOSCone — Typeconst SDSOSCone = NonnegPolyInnerCone{ScaledDiagonallyDominantConeTriangle}Scaled-diagonally-dominant-sum-of-squares cone; see [Definition 2, AM17] and NonnegPolyInnerCone.
[AM17] Ahmadi, A. A. & Majumdar, A. DSOS and SDSOS Optimization: More Tractable Alternatives to Sum of Squares and Semidefinite Optimization ArXiv e-prints, 2017.
SumOfSquares.DSOSCone — Typeconst DSOSCone = NonnegPolyInnerCone{DiagonallyDominantConeTriangle}Diagonally-dominant-sum-of-squares cone; see [Definition 2, AM17] and NonnegPolyInnerCone.
[AM17] Ahmadi, A. A. & Majumdar, A. DSOS and SDSOS Optimization: More Tractable Alternatives to Sum of Squares and Semidefinite Optimization ArXiv e-prints, 2017.
Approximations of the cone of positive semidefinite polynomial matrices:
SumOfSquares.PSDMatrixInnerCone — Typestruct PSDMatrixInnerCone{MCT <: MOI.AbstractVectorSet} <: PolyJuMP.PolynomialSet
endInner approximation of the cone of polynomial matrices P(x) that are positive semidefinite for any x defined by the set of $n \times n$ polynomial matrices such that the polynomial $y^\top P(x) y$ belongs to NonnegPolyInnerCone{MCT} where y is a vector of $n$ auxiliary polynomial variables.
SumOfSquares.SOSMatrixCone — Typeconst SOSMatrixCone = PSDMatrixInnerCone{MOI.PositiveSemidefiniteConeTriangle}Sum-of-squares matrices cone; see [Section 3.3.2, BPT12] and PSDMatrixInnerCone.
[BPT12] Blekherman, G.; Parrilo, P. A. & Thomas, R. R. Semidefinite Optimization and Convex Algebraic Geometry. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2012.
Approximations of the cone of convex polynomials:
SumOfSquares.ConvexPolyInnerCone — Typestruct ConvexPolyInnerCone{MCT} <: PolyJuMP.PolynomialSet endInner approximation of the set of convex polynomials defined by the set of polynomials such that their hessian belongs to to the set PSDMatrixInnerCone{MCT}()
SumOfSquares.SOSConvexCone — Typeconst SOSConvexCone = ConvexPolyInnerCone{MOI.PositiveSemidefiniteConeTriangle}Sum-of-squares convex polynomials cone; see [Section 3.3.3, BPT12] and ConvexPolyInnerCone.
[BPT12] Blekherman, G.; Parrilo, P. A. & Thomas, R. R. Semidefinite Optimization and Convex Algebraic Geometry. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2012.
Approximations of the cone of copositive matrices:
SumOfSquares.CopositiveInner — Typestruct CopositiveInner{S} <: PolyJuMP.PolynomialSet
# Inner approximation of the PSD cone, i.e. typically either
# `SOSCone`, `DSOSCone` or `SDSOSCone`,
psd_inner::S
endA symmetric matrix $Q$ is copositive if $x^{\top} Q x \ge 0$ for all vector $x$ in the nonnegative orthant. Checking copositivity is a co-NP-complete problem [MK87] and this cone is only the inner approximation of the cone of copositive symmetric matrices given by Minknowski sum of psd_inner and the cone of symmetric matrices with nonnegative entries (the diagonal entries can be chosen to be zero) [Lemma 3.164, BPT12].
The matrix with nonnegative entries can be interpreted as lagrangian multipliers. For instance,
@polyvar x y
@constraint(model, x^2 - 2x*y + y^2 in CopositiveInner(SOSCone()))is equivalent to
# Matrix that we require to be copositive
Q = [ 1 -1
-1 1]
λ = @variable(model, lower_bound=0)
# Symmetric matrix of nonnegative entries
Λ = [0 λ
λ 0]
using LinearAlgebra # For `Symmetric`
@constraint(model, Symmetric(Q - Λ) in PSDCone())which is equivalent to
@polyvar x y
λ = @variable(model, lower_bound=0)
@constraint(model, x^2 - 2x*y + y^2 - 2*λ * x*y in SOSCone())which is the same as, using the domain keyword,
@polyvar x y
@constraint(model, x^2 - 2x*y + y^2 in SOSCone(), domain = @set x*y ≥ 0)As an important difference with its equivalent forms, the GramMatrixAttribute for the copositive constraint is given by matrix Q while for the equivalent form using the domainkeyword, the value of the attribute would correspond to the the gram matrix in thepsd_innercone, i.e. which should be equal toQ - Λ`.
[BPT12] Blekherman, G.; Parrilo, P. A. & Thomas, R. R. Semidefinite Optimization and Convex Algebraic Geometry. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2012.
[MK87] K. G. Murty and S. N. Kabadi. Some NP-complete problems in quadratic and nonlinear programming. Mathematical programming, 39:117–129, 1987.
Types of sparsity
SumOfSquares.Certificate.Sparsity.Variable — Typestruct Sparsity.Variable <: Sparsity.Pattern endVariable or correlative sparsity as developed in [WSMM06].
[WSMM06] Waki, Hayato, Sunyoung Kim, Masakazu Kojima, and Masakazu Muramatsu. "Sums of squares and semidefinite program relaxations for polynomial optimization problems with structured sparsity." SIAM Journal on Optimization 17, no. 1 (2006): 218-242.
SumOfSquares.Certificate.Sparsity.Monomial — Typestruct Sparsity.Monomial{C<:CEG.AbstractCompletion} <: Sparsity.Pattern
completion::C
k::Int
use_all_monomials::Bool
endMonomial or term sparsity as developed in [WML20a, WML20b]. The completion field should be ClusterCompletion() [default] for the block-closure or cluster completion [WML20a], and ChordalCompletion() for chordal completion [WML20b]. The integer k [default=0] corresponds to Σ_k defined in [(3.2), WML20a] and k = 0 corresponds to Σ_* defined in [(3.3), WML20a]. If use_all_monomials is false then some monomials of the basis might be dropped from the basis if not needed.
[WML20a] Wang, Jie, Victor Magron, and Jean-Bernard Lasserre. TSSOS: A Moment-SOS hierarchy that exploits term sparsity. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.08899 (2020).
[WML20b] Wang, Jie, Victor Magron, and Jean-Bernard Lasserre. Chordal-TSSOS: a moment-SOS hierarchy that exploits term sparsity with chordal extension. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.03210 (2020).
SumOfSquares.Certificate.Sparsity.SignSymmetry — Typestruct SignSymmetry <: Sparsity.Pattern endSign symmetry as developed in [Section III.C, L09]. Let n be the number of variables. A sign-symmetry is a binary vector r of {0, 1}^n such that dot(r, e) is even for all exponent e.
Let o(e) be the binary vector of {0, 1}^n for which the ith bit is i iff the ith entry of e is odd. Let O be the set of o(e) for exponents of e. A binary vector r is a sign-symmetry if an only if it is orthogonal to all the elements of O.
Since we are only interested in the orthogonal subspace, say R, of O, even if O is not a linear subspace (i.e., it is not invariant under xor), we compute its span. We start by creating row echelon form of the span of O using XORSpace. We then compute a basis for R. The set R of sign symmetries will be the span of this basis.
Let a, b be exponents of monomials of the gram basis. For any r in R,
⟨r, o(a + b)⟩ = ⟨r, xor(o(a), o(b)⟩ = xor(⟨r, o(a)⟩, ⟨r, o(b)⟩)For o(a, b) to be sign symmetric, this scalar product should be zero for all sign symmetry r. This is equivalent to saying that ⟨r, o(a)⟩ and ⟨r, o(b)⟩ are equal for all r in R. In other words, the projection of o(a) and o(b) to R have the same coordinates in the basis. If we order the monomials by grouping them by equal coordinates of projection, we see that the product that are sign symmetric form a block diagonal structure. This means that we can group the monomials by these coordinates.
[L09] Löfberg, Johan. Pre-and post-processing sum-of-squares programs in practice. IEEE transactions on automatic control 54, no. 5 (2009): 1007-1011.
SumOfSquares.Certificate.Sparsity.XORSpace — Typemutable struct XORSpace{T<:Integer}
dimension::Int
basis::Vector{T}
endBasis for a linear subspace of the Hamming space (i.e. set of binary string {0, 1}^n of length n) represented in the bits of an integer of type T. This is used to implement Certificate.Sparsity.SignSymmetry.
Consider the scalar product ⟨a, b⟩ which returns the the xor of the bits of a & b. It is a scalar product since ⟨a, b⟩ = ⟨b, a⟩ and ⟨a, xor(b, c)⟩ = xor(⟨a, b⟩, ⟨a, c⟩).
We have two options here to compute the orthogonal space.
The first one is to build an orthogonal basis with some kind of Gram-Schmidt process and then to obtain the orthogonal space by removing the projection from each vector of the basis.
The second option, which is the one we use here is to compute the row echelon form and then read out the orthogonal subspace directly from it. For instance, if the row echelon form is
1 a 0 c e
b 1 d fthen the orthogonal basis is
a 1 b 0 0
c 0 d 1 0
e 0 f 0 1The basis vector has dimension nonzero elements. Any element added with push! can be obtained as the xor of some of the elements of basis. Moreover, the basis is kept in row echelon form in the sense that the first, second, ..., i - 1th bits of basis[i] are zero and basis[i] is zero if its ith bit is not one.
Ideal certificates:
SumOfSquares.Certificate.MaxDegree — Typestruct MaxDegree{CT <: SumOfSquares.SOSLikeCone, BT <: MB.AbstractPolynomialBasis} <: SimpleIdealCertificate{CT, BT}
cone::CT
basis::Type{BT}
maxdegree::Int
endThe MaxDegree certificate ensures the nonnegativity of p(x) for all x such that h_i(x) = 0 by exhibiting a Sum-of-Squares polynomials σ(x) such that p(x) - σ(x) is guaranteed to be zero for all x such that h_i(x) = 0. The polynomial σ(x) is search over cone with a basis of type basis such that the degree of σ(x) does not exceed maxdegree.
SumOfSquares.Certificate.FixedBasis — Typestruct FixedBasis{CT <: SumOfSquares.SOSLikeCone, BT <: MB.AbstractPolynomialBasis} <: SimpleIdealCertificate{CT, BT}
cone::CT
basis::BT
endThe FixedBasis certificate ensures the nonnegativity of p(x) for all x such that h_i(x) = 0 by exhibiting a Sum-of-Squares polynomials σ(x) such that p(x) - σ(x) is guaranteed to be zero for all x such that h_i(x) = 0. The polynomial σ(x) is search over cone with basis basis.
SumOfSquares.Certificate.Newton — Typestruct Newton{CT <: SumOfSquares.SOSLikeCone, BT <: MB.AbstractPolynomialBasis, NPT <: Tuple} <: SimpleIdealCertificate{CT, BT}
cone::CT
basis::Type{BT}
variable_groups::NPT
endThe Newton certificate ensures the nonnegativity of p(x) for all x such that h_i(x) = 0 by exhibiting a Sum-of-Squares polynomials σ(x) such that p(x) - σ(x) is guaranteed to be zero for all x such that h_i(x) = 0. The polynomial σ(x) is search over cone with a basis of type basis chosen using the multipartite Newton polytope with parts variable_groups. If variable_groups = tuple() then it falls back to the classical Newton polytope with all variables in the same part.
SumOfSquares.Certificate.Remainder — Typestruct Remainder{GCT<:AbstractIdealCertificate} <: AbstractIdealCertificate
gram_certificate::GCT
endThe Remainder certificate ensures the nonnegativity of p(x) for all x such that h_i(x) = 0 by guaranteeing the remainder of p(x) modulo the ideal generated by ⟨h_i⟩ to be nonnegative for all x such that h_i(x) = 0 using the certificate gram_certificate. For instance, if gram_certificate is SumOfSquares.Certificate.Newton, then the certificate Remainder(gram_certificate) will take the remainder before computing the Newton polytope hence might generate a much smaller Newton polytope hence a smaller basis and smaller semidefinite program. However, this then corresponds to a lower degree of the hierarchy which might be insufficient to find a certificate.
SumOfSquares.Certificate.Sparsity.Ideal — Typestruct Sparsity.Ideal{S <: Sparsity.Pattern, C <: AbstractIdealCertificate} <: SumOfSquares.Certificate.AbstractIdealCertificate
sparsity::S
certificate::C
endSame certificate as certificate except that the Sum-of-Squares polynomial σ is modelled as a sum of Sum-of-Squares polynomials with smaller bases using the sparsity reduction sparsity.
SumOfSquares.Certificate.Symmetry.Ideal — Typestruct Symmetry.Ideal{C,GT,AT<:SymbolicWedderburn.Action} <: SumOfSquares.Certificate.AbstractIdealCertificate
pattern::Symmetry.Pattern{GT,AT}
certificate::C
endSame certificate as certificate except that the Sum-of-Squares polynomial σ is modelled as a sum of Sum-of-Squares polynomials with smaller bases using the Symbolic Wedderburn decomposition of the symmetry pattern specified by pattern.
Preorder certificates:
SumOfSquares.Certificate.Putinar — Typestruct Putinar{
MC<:AbstractIdealCertificate,
IC<:AbstractIdealCertificate,
} <: AbstractPreorderCertificate
multipliers_certificate::MC
ideal_certificate::IC
maxdegree::Int
endThe Putinar certificate ensures the nonnegativity of p(x) for all x such that g_i(x) >= 0 and h_i(x) = 0 by exhibiting Sum-of-Squares polynomials σ_i(x) such that p(x) - ∑ σ_i(x) g_i(x) is guaranteed to be nonnegativity for all x such that h_i(x) = 0. The polynomials σ_i(x) are search over cone with a basis of type basis such that the degree of σ_i(x) g_i(x) does not exceed maxdegree.
SumOfSquares.Certificate.Sparsity.Preorder — Typestruct Sparsity.Preorder{S <: Sparsity.Pattern, C <: SumOfSquares.Certificate.AbstractPreorderCertificate} <: SumOfSquares.Certificate.AbstractPreorderCertificate
sparsity::S
certificate::C
endSame certificate as C except that the Sum-of-Squares polynomials σ_i are modelled as a sum of Sum-of-Squares polynomials with smaller basis using the sparsity reduction sparsity.
Attributes
PolyJuMP.MomentsAttribute — TypeMomentsAttribute(N)
MomentsAttribute()A constraint attribute for the vector of moments corresponding to the constraint that a polynomial is zero in the full space in result N. If the polynomial is constrained to be zero in an algebraic set, it is the moments for the constraint once it is rewritten into an constraint on the full space. If N is omitted, it is 1 by default.
Examples
Consider the following program:
@variable(model, α)
@variable(model, β ≤ 1)
using DynamicPolynomials
@polyvar x y
cref = @constraint(model, α * x - β * y == 0, domain = @set x == y)The constraint is equivalent to
@constraint(model, (α - β) * y == 0)for which the dual is the 1-element vector with the moment of y of value -1. This is the result of moments(cref). However, the dual of cref obtained by dual(cref) is the 2-elements vector with both the moments of x and y of value -1.
MultivariateMoments.moments — Methodmoments(cref::JuMP.ConstraintRef)Return the MomentsAttribute of cref.
SumOfSquares.GramMatrix — Typestruct GramMatrix{T, B, U, MT <: AbstractMatrix{T}} <: AbstractGramMatrix{T, B, U}
Q::MT
basis::B
endGram matrix $x^\top Q x$ where Q is a symmetric matrix indexed by the vector of polynomials of the basis basis.
SumOfSquares.GramMatrixAttribute — TypeGramMatrixAttribute(N)
GramMatrixAttribute()A constraint attribute for the GramMatrix of a constraint, that is, the positive semidefinite matrix Q indexed by the monomials in the vector X such that $X^\top Q X$ is the sum-of-squares certificate of the constraint.
SumOfSquares.gram_matrix — Functiongram_matrix(cref::JuMP.ConstraintRef)Return the GramMatrixAttribute of cref.
SumOfSquares.gram_operate — Functiongram_operate(::typeof(+), p::GramMatrix, q::GramMatrix)Computes the Gram matrix equal to the sum between p and q. On the opposite, p + q gives a polynomial equal to p + q. The polynomial p + q can also be obtained by polynomial(gram_operate(+, p, q)).
gram_operate(/, p::GramMatrix, α)Computes the Gram matrix equal to p / α. On the opposite, p / α gives a polynomial equal to p / α. The polynomial p / α can also be obtained by polynomial(gram_operate(/, p, α)).
SumOfSquares.MomentMatrixAttribute — TypeMomentMatrixAttribute(N)
MomentMatrixAttribute()A constraint attribute fot the MomentMatrix of a constraint.
MultivariateMoments.moment_matrix — Functionmoment_matrix(cref::JuMP.ConstraintRef)Return the MomentMatrixAttribute of cref.
SumOfSquares.CertificateBasis — Typestruct CertificateBasis <: MOI.AbstractConstraintAttribute endA constraint attribute for the basis indexing the GramMatrixAttribute and MomentMatrixAttribute certificates.
SumOfSquares.certificate_basis — Functioncertificate_basis(cref::JuMP.ConstraintRef)Return the CertificateBasis of cref.
SumOfSquares.certificate_monomials — Functioncertificate_monomials(cref::JuMP.ConstraintRef)Return the monomials of certificate_basis. If the basis if not MultivariateBases.AbstractMonomialBasis, an error is thrown.
SumOfSquares.LagrangianMultipliers — TypeLagrangianMultipliers(N)
LagrangianMultipliers()A constraint attribute fot the LagrangianMultipliers associated to the inequalities of the domain of a constraint. There is one multiplier per inequality and no multiplier for equalities as the equalities are handled by reducing the polynomials over the ideal they generate instead of explicitely creating multipliers.
SumOfSquares.lagrangian_multipliers — Functionlagrangian_multipliers(cref::JuMP.ConstraintRef)Return the LagrangianMultipliers of cref.
SumOfSquares.SOSDecomposition — Typestruct SOSDecomposition{T, PT}Represents a Sum-of-Squares decomposition without domain.
SumOfSquares.SOSDecompositionWithDomain — Typestruct SOSDecompositionWithDomain{T, PT, S}Represents a Sum-of-Squares decomposition on a basic semi-algebraic domain.
SumOfSquares.SOSDecompositionAttribute — Typestruct SOSDecompositionAttribute
ranktol::Real
dec::MultivariateMoments.LowRankLDLTAlgorithm
endA constraint attribute for the SOSDecomposition of a constraint. By default, it is computed using SOSDecomposition(gram, ranktol, dec) where gram is the value of the GramMatrixAttribute.
SumOfSquares.sos_decomposition — Functionsos_decomposition(cref::JuMP.ConstraintRef)Return the SOSDecompositionAttribute of cref.
sos_decomposition(cref::JuMP.ConstraintRef, K<:AbstractBasicSemialgebraicSet)Return representation in the quadraic module associated with K.
Bridges are automatically added using the following utilities:
PolyJuMP.bridgeable — Functionbridgeable(c::JuMP.AbstractConstraint, S::Type{<:MOI.AbstractSet})Wrap the constraint c in JuMP.BridgeableConstraints that may be needed to bridge variables constrained in S on creation.
bridgeable(c::JuMP.AbstractConstraint, F::Type{<:MOI.AbstractFunction},
S::Type{<:MOI.AbstractSet})Wrap the constraint c in JuMP.BridgeableConstraints that may be needed to bridge F-in-S constraints.
PolyJuMP.bridges — Functionbridges(F::Type{<:MOI.AbstractFunction}, S::Type{<:MOI.AbstractSet})Return a list of bridges that may be needed to bridge F-in-S constraints but not the bridges that may be needed by constraints added by the bridges.
bridges(S::Type{<:MOI.AbstractSet})Return a list of bridges that may be needed to bridge variables constrained in S on creation but not the bridges that may be needed by constraints added by the bridges.
Chordal extension:
SumOfSquares.Certificate.Sparsity.ChordalExtensionGraph.neighbors — Functionneighbors(G::Graph, node::Int}Return neighbors of node in G.
SumOfSquares.Certificate.Sparsity.ChordalExtensionGraph.fill_in — Functionfill_in(G::Graph{T}, i::T}Return number of edges that need to be added to make the neighbors of i a clique.
SumOfSquares.Certificate.Sparsity.ChordalExtensionGraph.is_clique — Functionis_clique(G::Graph{T}, x::Vector{T})Return a Bool indication whether x is a clique in G.
SumOfSquares.Certificate.Sparsity.ChordalExtensionGraph.LabelledGraph — Typestruct LabelledGraph{T}
n2int::Dict{T,Int}
int2n::Vector{T}
graph::Graph
endType to represend a graph with nodes of type T.
SumOfSquares.Certificate.Sparsity.ChordalExtensionGraph.add_node! — Functionadd_node!(G::LabelledGraph{T}, i::T) where TAdd the node i to graph G. If i is already a node of G, only return the reference.
SumOfSquares.Certificate.Sparsity.ChordalExtensionGraph.add_edge! — Functionadd_edge!(G::LabelledGraph{T}, i::T, j::T) where TAdd the unweighted edge (i, j) to graph G. Duplicate edges are not taken into account.
add_edge!(G::LabelledGraph{T}, e::Tuple{T,T}) where TAdd the unweighted edge e to graph G. Duplicate edges are not taken into account.
SumOfSquares.Certificate.Sparsity.ChordalExtensionGraph.add_clique! — Functionadd_clique!(G::LabelledGraph{T}, x::Vector{T}) where TAdd all elements of x as nodes to G and add edges such that x is fully connected in G.
SumOfSquares.Certificate.Sparsity.ChordalExtensionGraph.completion — Functioncompletion(G::Graph, comp::ChordalCompletion)Return a chordal extension of G and the corresponding maximal cliques.
The algoritm is Algorithm 3 in [BA10] with the GreedyFillIn heuristic of Table I.
[BA10] Bodlaender, Hans L., and Arie MCA Koster. Treewidth computations I. Upper bounds. Information and Computation 208, no. 3 (2010): 259-275. Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands www.cs.uu.nl
completion(G::Graph, comp::ChordalCompletion)Return a cluster completion of G and the corresponding maximal cliques.
Bridges for polynomial optimization
PolyJuMP.ScalarPolynomialFunction — Typestruct ScalarPolynomialFunction{P<:MP.AbstractPolynomialLike} <: MOI.AbstractScalarFunction
p::P
variables::Vector{MOI.VariableIndex}
endDefines the polynomial function of the variables variables where the variable variables(p)[i] corresponds to variables[i].
PolyJuMP.Bridges.Objective.ToPolynomialBridge — TypeToPolynomialBridge{T}ToPolynomialBridge implements the following reformulations:
- $\min \{f(x)\}$ into $\min\{p(x)\}$
- $\max \{f(x)\}$ into $\max\{p(x)\}$
where $f(x)$ is a scalar function and $p(x)$ is a polynomial.
Source node
ToPolynomialBridge supports:
MOI.ObjectiveFunction{F}whereFis aMOI.AbstractScalarFunctionfor whichconvert(::Type{PolyJuMP.ScalarPolynomialFunction}, ::Type{F}). That is for instance the case forMOI.VariableIndex,MOI.ScalarAffineFunctionandMOI.ScalarQuadraticFunction.
Target nodes
ToPolynomialBridge creates:
- One objective node:
MOI.ObjectiveFunction{PolyJuMP.ScalarPolynomialFunction{T}}
PolyJuMP.Bridges.Constraint.ToPolynomialBridge — TypeToPolynomialBridge{T,S} <: Bridges.Constraint.AbstractBridgeToPolynomialBridge implements the following reformulations:
- $f(x) \in S$ into $p(x) \in S$ where $f(x)$ is a scalar function and $p(x)$ is a polynomial.
Source node
ToPolynomialBridge supports:
FinSwhereFis aMOI.AbstractScalarFunctionfor which
convert(::Type{PolyJuMP.ScalarPolynomialFunction}, ::Type{F}). That is for instance the case for MOI.VariableIndex, MOI.ScalarAffineFunction and MOI.ScalarQuadraticFunction.
Target nodes
ToPolynomialBridge creates:
Internal functions
SumOfSquares.Certificate.Symmetry.orthogonal_transformation_to — Functionorthogonal_transformation_to(A, B)Return an orthogonal transformation U such that A = U' * B * U
Given Schur decompositions A = Z_A * S_A * Z_A' B = Z_B * S_B * Z_B' Since P' * S_A * P = D' * S_B * D, we have A = Z_A * P * Z_B' * B * Z_B * P' * Z_A'
SumOfSquares.Certificate.Symmetry._reorder! — Function_reorder!(F::LinearAlgebra.Schur{T}) where {T}Given a Schur decomposition of a, reorder it so that its eigenvalues are in in increasing order.
Note that if T<:Real, F.Schur is quasi upper triangular. By (quasi), we mean that there may be nonzero entries in S[i+1,i] representing complex conjugates. In that case, the complex conjugate are permuted together. If T<:Complex, then S is triangular.
SumOfSquares.Certificate.Symmetry._rotate_complex — Function_rotate_complex(A::AbstractMatrix{T}, B::AbstractMatrix{T}; tol = Base.rtoldefault(real(T))) where {T}Given (quasi) upper triangular matrix A and B that have the eigenvalues in the same order except the complex pairs which may need to be (signed) permuted, returns an othogonal matrix P such that P' * A * P and B have matching low triangular part. The upper triangular part will be dealt with by _sign_diag.
By (quasi), we mean that if S is a Matrix{<:Real}, then there may be nonzero entries in S[i+1,i] representing complex conjugates. If S is a Matrix{<:Complex}, then S is upper triangular so there is nothing to do.